Legal Opinion

Ashland Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 2017No. A16-1257Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Justice.

At issue in this appeal from the tax court is whether the consequences of an election made under federal tax law by a foreign entity owned by respondent Ash-land Inc., a domestic unitary business, must be recognized in determining Ash-land’s Minnesota tax liability. Concluding that the income and apportionment factors of the foreign entity were improperly included in Ashland’s combined return, relator Commissioner of Revenue excluded the foreign entity’s income and apportionment factors in calculating Ashland’s Minnesota tax liability. The tax court disagreed with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In re Pera Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of BrittainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API