Legal Opinion

Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 2018No. A17-0923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHUTICH, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether the Commissioner of Revenue ("the Commissioner") properly invoked her alternative-apportionment authority under Minnesota Statutes section 290.20, subdivision 1 (2016), and if so, what burden the Commissioner bears when using that authority. Respondents Associated Bank, N.A., and its affiliates ("the Bank"), which include the members of two Wisconsin limited liability companies (LLCs), objected to the Commissioner's assessment of additional state corporate franchise tax liability for tax years 2007 and 2008. Although the Bank correctly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  2. Humana MarketPoint, Inc., Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  3. Pitman Farms v. Kuehl Poultry LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API