Legal Opinion

McClain v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1992No. 9114SC486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff first assigns error to the trial court’s exclusion of evidence that the worn leveling brush found in Elevator No. 1 following Ms. McClain’s accident was replaced and destroyed by defendant. Plaintiff contends that this evidence is admissible to show that the worn brush could have caused the elevator to malfunction in the manner described by Ms. McClain.

This issue is answered directly by the language of Rule 407 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence which states:

When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Klassette Ex Rel. Klassette v. Mecklenburg County Area Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berrier v. ThriftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Jones (Griffin) v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. HolstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API