Legal Opinion
Moreno v. City of King
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 2005No. H026628PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
The trial court granted plaintiff Roberto Moreno’s petition for a writ of mandate after it found that defendant City of King’s termination of Moreno’s employment as the City of King’s finance director was null and void because it had occurred in a manner that violated the Brown Act, California’s open meeting law. (Gov. Code, § 54950.5 et seq.) On appeal, City of King (the City) asserts that the trial court erred in finding that it violated the Brown Act and in finding that it had not “cured” any violations. Defendant Keith Breskin, the City’s city manager, claims that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fischer v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bollinger v. San Diego Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Furtado v. Sierra Community CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Olson v. Hornbrook Cmty. Servs. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Hernandez v. Town of Apple ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ricasa v. Office of Admin. Hearings, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.