San Diegans for Open Government v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
The record here demonstrates that in publishing its agenda with respect to its consideration of an agreement under which a developer would be paid a subsidy in the form of remission of $11 million for transient occupancy tax (TOT) collected from a luxury hotel the developer agreed to build, as well as other concessions, the city council of defendant and respondent City of Oceanside (the city) 1 met the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, 2 § 54950.5 et seq.). Under the agreement, the city was initially obligated to pay the developer 100 percent of TOT receipts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moreno v. City of KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Carlson v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- North Pacifica LLC v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golden Eagle Land Inv., L.P. v. Rancho Santa Fe Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Olson v. Hornbrook Cmty. Servs. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Berkeley People's Alliance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Berkeley People's Alliance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Chemical Toxin Working Grp. v. Kroger Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.