Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Los Angeles Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1999No. B114232PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

Introduction

In this appeal, we reconcile provisions of the Education Code, which give a board of education an absolute right not to reelect 1 probationary employees, with the open meeting requirement of the Ralph M. Brown Act, which requires that certain employees be given written notice of a right to have “specific complaints or charges” against them heard in open session. We conclude that Government Code section 54957 2 and Education Code section 44929.21 permit a school board not to reelect probationary teachers in a closed session, and that an evaluation of performance…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Bakersfield Elementary Teachers Ass'n v. Bakersfield City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Moreno v. City of KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API