Legal Opinion

Ricasa v. Office of Admin. Hearings

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 17, 2018No. D071088; D071122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNares, Acting P. J.

Lozano Smith, Mark W. Waterman and Mark K. Kitabayashi for Respondents, Appellants and Real Parties in Interest Southwestern Community College District Governing Board and Southwestern Community College District.

*266Southwestern Community College District (District) and its governing board (Board) (together Southwestern) demoted Arlie Ricasa from an academic administrator position to a faculty position on the grounds of moral turpitude, immoral conduct, and unfitness to serve in her then-current role. Ricasa filed two petitions for writs of administrative mandamus in the trial court seeking,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. TransparentGov Novato v. City of Novato, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Crawford v. Comm. on Prof. Competence etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Cruz v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. TransparentGov Novato v. City of NovatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API