Legal Opinion

Pattee Plow Co. v. Kingman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1889No. 88PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. In equity for the infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill, from which complainant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chief Justice • Fullee

delivered the opinion of the court;

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the ' United States for the Eastern District of Missouri, dismissing appellant’s bill of complaint.

The bill charges appellees with infringement of the second claim of reissued letters patent No. 6080, dated October 6,1874, which is a reissue of original patent No. 124,218, to. J. _H. Pat-tee, dated March 5; 1872; of the- first and second .claims of •original patent No. 174,684, granted Thomas- W. Kendall, .March 14, 1876-; and of original patent No. 187,899, gr'anted Henry H..…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  3. Hestonville, M. & F. Pass. Ry. Co. v. McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  4. Featherstone v. George R. Bidwell Cycle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  5. International Terra Cotta Lumber Co. v. MaurerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API