Legal Opinion

Dominion National Bank v. Manning

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1899No. 11282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Eyror from Cowley district court; W. T. McBride, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J. :

This was an action brought by the Dominion National Bank of Bristol, Virginia, against E. C. Manning, to recover the amount claimed to be due upon two promissory notes — one for $2235, the other for $1500, with interest on both — and to foreclose a mortgage executed to the said E. C. Manning by one E. F. Manning, and which the former had assigned to the plaintiff as collateral security. E. C. Manning denied liability on both notes except as to $230 of the larger one. As to the remainder of that one, he claimed that it was a renewal of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . RidgwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Milich v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thisler v. MackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Bailey v. Lankford, Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Page v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API