Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Eisenman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2012No. 38703PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action brought by Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho (Farm Bureau). Farm Bureau commenced the action in response to a claim for insurance benefits filed by the personal representatives of the estate of a deceased policyholder (the Estate). Farm Bureau requested a judgment declaring that the Estate is not an “insured” under the decedent’s insurance policy (the Policy) and is therefore not entitled to payment of wrongful death damages under the Policy’s underinsured motorist coverage.

The district court granted the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rim View Trout Co. v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. State Farm InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Corey Allen ThielIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. ABK v. Mid-Century InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Big D Builders, Inc. v. American Zurich Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
  5. Dickenson v. Benewah CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API