Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Fisher

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1905No. S.F. No. 4396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PETITION in the Supreme Court for Writ of Mandate to the Auditor of El Dorado County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is a proceeding instituted in this court to obtain the issuance of a writ of mandate requiring the defendant, as auditor of El Dorado County, to draw his warrant for the salary of plaintiff, Wilson, as superintendent of schools of said county, for the month of July, 1905. Plaintiff has been holding said office ever since January, 1903, and discharging the duties thereof, under a certificate of election issued in pursuance of a declaration that he had been duly elected to said office, made by the board of supervisors of said county on their canvass of the returns of the general election…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Finigan v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bledsoe v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Anderson v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wilson v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People Ex Rel. Barker v. ShaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chubbuck v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Benwell v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Thomas v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  4. Wilson v. ArnotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API