Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Arnot

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1905No. Civ. No. 147Published

PETITION for mandamus to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions by the judge of the Superior Court of El Dorado County. N. D. Arnot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.

The petitioner is contestee in a contested election case for the office of superintendent of schools in El Dorado county. The case was tried in the superior court of said county and on June 12, 1905, judgment was entered in favor of the contestant, T. E. McCarty, and against the petitioner here. Notice of the judgment was duly given petitioner on June 17, 19.05, and on June 29, 1905, the county clerk issued to the said McCarty a certificate of election as superintendent of schools, and McCarty duly qualified on the last-mentioned date and demanded possession of the office. Thereafter, and on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Wilson v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API