Legal Opinion

Aqua Group LLC v. Federal Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 15, 2009No. Case 2:08-cv-11766PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-RESPONSE (docket no. 45) AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket nos. 29 and 89)

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

I. Facts

This case involves the plaintiff Aqua Group’s claims for insurance benefits for sewer inspection equipment that was allegedly stolen from it. Many of the relevant facts are laid out in the Court’s Opinion and Order of March 23d, 2009, docket no. 48, and need not be repeated here. In short, in October 2006 Aqua Group LLC (“Aqua”) purchased a Ford cube van that it used for its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Backhaus v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Bates v. Hartford Ins. Co. of MidwestDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Whitehouse Condominium Group, LLC v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  4. Paul v. Henri-Liné Machine Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  5. Stoudemire v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API