Mularkey v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Defendant contends that the court erred in admitting certain testimony; in refusing to dismiss the pros-ecutiqnfmid discharge the defendant; in ref using, ffo give *430certain requested instructions to the jury; and in giving certain instructions. Upon reviewing the record we find no error in any respect.
Although there was a conflict in the evidence, it fairly and reasonably permitted the jury to consider the following facts established: At the time and place charged, the defendant, during an altercation, turned to his automobile and took a 32-Colt automatic revolver from a holster which was on a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- De Friend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Mayfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Leonard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Lipscomb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Curl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.