Legal Opinion

Mularkey v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1930PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Defendant contends that the court erred in admitting certain testimony; in refusing to dismiss the pros-ecutiqnfmid discharge the defendant; in ref using, ffo give *430certain requested instructions to the jury; and in giving certain instructions. Upon reviewing the record we find no error in any respect.

Although there was a conflict in the evidence, it fairly and reasonably permitted the jury to consider the following facts established: At the time and place charged, the defendant, during an altercation, turned to his automobile and took a 32-Colt automatic revolver from a holster which was on a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. De Friend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Mayfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Leonard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Lipscomb v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HamdanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Curl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API