Curl v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
This is a shotgun blast type of appeal, asserting nearly a dozen reasons for reversing the judgment of the trial court. The reasons given vary greatly in size. Some seem minor in nature. Some have greater thrust and raise issues of consequence. Each will be dealt with, birdshot to buckshot, in order of their importance as they appear to us.
Repeated Instruction.
Defendant complains that a portion of the instructions were repeated to the jury. It appears that after the jury had retired to consider its verdict, it sought rein-struction on “whether the party involved had an intent to use the gun…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Hempton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Steele v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Jeffrey Ames Hughes v. James Mathews, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- State v. KoputWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.