Legal Opinion
Howard, McRoberts & Murray v. Starry
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1986No. C4-85-1767PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Howard, McRoberts & Murray (HM & M) brought this action against respondents Myrtle Starry and Larry Starry to quiet title to a 360-acre tract of land. HM & M appeals the trial court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Myrtle Starry. We affirm.
FACTS
HM & M’s claim against the property in issue arises out of legal services that it provided for Larry Starry for which he did not pay. On October 15, 1981, a judgment for the unpaid legal services was entered against Larry Starry in favor of HM & M for $7,604.64. HM & M collected its judgment by foreclosing on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bailey v. GalpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Marr v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lindquist v. Household Industrial Finance Co. (In Re Vondall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Linquist v. Household Industrial Finance Co. (In Re Vondall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.