Legal Opinion
Kochuk v. Labaha
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 18, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action in three counts asking for damages, an accounting, that a conveyance be set aside, and a deed corrected. Before us the plaintiff has limited his claim to a recovery of damages against the defendant bank for breaches of duty while acting as conservator for the plaintiff. The case was tried to the court and judgment entered for the plaintiff to recover from the defendant bank $1279.15. The essential facts are these: The defendants John and Mary Labaha are husband and wife. In 1923, John Labaha and the plaintiff purchased for $750 an undivided one-half interest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Nikitiuk v. PishteySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Silverstein v. LascheverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- DiMauro v. PaviaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Porto v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.