Legal Opinion

Popkin v. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 20, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc., a creditor of the bankrupt corporation procured from the District Court an order, erroneously called a “ne exeat," forbidding Popkin, the president of the corporation, to leave the jurisdiction; this for the purpose of securing his attendance in the bankruptcy proceedings. Pop-kin moved to vacate the order (“quash the writ”), and the District Court denied the motion by order entered February 21, 1931. On March 21,1931, within thirty days of the entry of the order, Popkin filed a petition for allowance of the appeal with his assignments of error in the District Court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Old Nick Williams Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. J. D. Randall Co. v. Foglesong Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Bakelite Corporation v. National Aniline & Chem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API