J. D. Randall Co. v. Foglesong Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. Suit in equity by the Foglesong Machine Company against the J. D. Randall Company. From an order granting a preliminary injunction, defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
The appeal in this cause is taken, under section 129 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1134 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 194]), from an interlocutory decree granting an injunction in a patent cause. Motion is made to dismiss, on the ground that the appeal was not taken within 30 days. The decree appealed from was made and entered August IS, 1912. Appeal papers in due form were mailed by appellant’s counsel to District Judge Sater, with a letter dated September 13th, and were received by him as early as September 14th. District Judge Hollister, who made the decree,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Old Nick Williams Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jaritas Live Stock Co. v. SpriggsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Toledo Metal Wheel Co. v. Foyer Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Ross v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Camden Iron Works Co. v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.