Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 1936No. 5623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from two orders of the District Court denying appellant’s petition for review and confirming the referee’s order approving the debtor’s plan for extension and composition of her debts, filed by appellee under section 74 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 202, and allowing her attorney certain fees which she was by the order authorized to pay from the funds of the estate then in her possession.

The first question which is presented to us is as to the jurisdiction of this court to hear the appeal which appellee contends was not presented…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. Van DorenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  3. Popkin v. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Salomon v. HjelmquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Compton v. National Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  3. In Re ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Investors Syndicate v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Brennan v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API