Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1941No. 69PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice. Douglas
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U. S. 382, decided on March 11, 1940, held that appeals from all orders making or refusing to make allowances of compensation or reimbursement under Ch. X of the Chandler Act (52 Stat. 840) may be had only at the discretion of the Circuit Court of Appeals. Prior to that decision the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had held that 'appeals from such orders (involving $500 or more) could be had as a matter- of right. London v. O’Dougherty, 102 F. 2d 524. Subsequent to the decision in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. PillsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hoiness v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.