MOBIL OIL CORPORATION v. Commercial National Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
Mobil Oil Corporation appeals from an unfavorable judgment in its garnishment action against Commercial National Bank. The' case was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to Rule 263, Vernon’s Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, each party contending that the undisputed facts as a matter of law entitle it to a judgment. Our only task, therefore, is to determine, without regard to the pleadings, whether the judgment was correct. White v. State, 329 S.W.2d 446 (Tex.Civ.App., Dallas 1959, writ ref’d n. r. e.).
Agreed Facts
On September 16, 1966…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. MueggeTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Pioneer Mutual Compensation Corp. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Pritchett v. Highway Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Manning v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.