Legal Opinion
Cholewinski v. Conway
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 26, 1988No. 5935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages which was originally brought in the small claims court and transferred to the regular session docket. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) by rendering a default judgment against him on January 13, 1987, in a trial which was allegedly assigned in violation of *237Practice Book §§ 261, 270 and 271, (2) by vacating the January 20,1987 nonsuit against the plaintiff ordered by another trial judge, and (3) by denying the defendant’s motion to open the default judgment. We find error in part.
The following…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Manchester State Bank v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Triton Associates v. Six New Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- National Iron Bank v. GelorminoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- McLaughlin v. SmoronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Lampart v. State, No. 322668 (Oct. 18, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995