Legal Opinion

People v. Barrajas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1998No. F027418PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

Rene Barrajas appeals following his conviction for attempted possession of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a); Pen. Code, § 664.) He challenges the district attorney’s determination that he was statutorily ineligible for drug diversion. The People concede the issue. We will reverse.

Background

On March 8, 1996, Deputy Eligió Lara of the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department was working undercover as part of a drug sting operation at the Fast and Friendly Market in New London when Barrajas and another man drove into the parking lot and asked him if he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. MartinsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. VillelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. OrmistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. POPULARCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. SturialeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. OrmistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Opinion No. (2001), California Attorney General Reports2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API