Legal Opinion

People v. Sturiale

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2000No. F033825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILDNER, J. *

AnthonyJohn Sturiale, appellant, contends: (1) the trial court erred when it concluded it could not “overrule” the prosecution’s determination he was ineligible for the deferred entry of judgment process (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 1000-1000.4); (2) People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754 [159 Cal.Rptr. 696, 602 P.2d 396] (Harvey) precludes the use of the circumstances giving rise to a dismissed count when determining eligibility for deferred entry of judgment; and (3) an admission to a prior “strike” (§ 667, subd. (d)) does not render a defendant ineligible for deferred entry of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sledge v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. BarrajasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. OrmistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. AndreottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. People v. OrmistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API