Legal Opinion

People v. POPULAR

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 2007No. F049564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAWSON, J.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

We consider here and reject appellant’s argument that, after the passage of three years, a trial court loses jurisdiction to revoke deferred entry of judgment pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 1000 et seq. and to reinstate criminal proceedings.

On April 12, 2002, officers stopped appellant’s vehicle and found approximately one pound of marijuana and $3,720 in currency. A felony complaint was filed, which after amendment alleged appellant transported marijuana in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11360, subdivision (a), possessed marijuana…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. TraskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Myers v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API