Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1988No. 54629PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

The defendant appeals from her jury trial conviction for aggravated robbery, with a penalty-enhancing specification for possessing a firearm. She complains that the state sought to prove her guilt by showing her participation in a different robbery two years earlier. The circumstances of the earlier robbery lacked sufficient correlation to the present charge, and the remaining evidence of the offender’s identity was less than clear. Hence, we hold that the disputed evidence was prejudicially improper.

I

The state relied on testimony from the victim of this offense, a victim of another robbery…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. HectorOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. BivenOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. WeakleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API