Nusbaum v. Warwick Hotel Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
This is an action of assumpsit by Lee Nusbaum, trading as Pennsylvania Engineering Company, against the Warwick Hotel Company, now changed to 1701 Locust Hotel Company, to recover $765 for labor and materials furnished in a new building located at 1709 Locust Street, Philadelphia, known as the Warwick Annex. The owner of the premises was 1709 Locust Street Corporation. The Warwick Hotel Company operated the Warwick Hotel and proposed to operate the annex.
Plaintiff’s statement averred that the work was done in pursuance of an agreement with the duly authorized agent of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Scott v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Beymer v. BonsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Murphy v. Beverly Hills Realty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Lapayowker v. Lincoln College Preparatory SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corp. v. Richard D. Sweeney and Ruth T. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- McKnight v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.