Legal Opinion

Brookside Distilling Products Corp. v. Monarch Wine Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1951No. Appeal, No. 85PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

Brookside Distilling Products Corporation, appellant, instituted this action in assumpsit to recover the amount paid by it for a quantity of wine ordered from and shipped by Monarch Wine Company of Georgia, appellee, contending that the wine supplied did not comply with Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board standards. At the trial, a jury returned a verdict for Monarch Wine Company. Brookside Distilling Products Corporation moved for a new trial, assigning as the principal error, the instruction of the trial judge that if the appellant made no test or no adequate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Anderson v. Guerrein Sky-Way Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Tennant v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tobash v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Yoder v. T. F. Scholes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Flavin v. ALDRICHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. NasutiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Jones v. TREEGOOBSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API