Legal Opinion

Catalano v. Corcoran

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1925No. Appeal 69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This suit was brought for breach of express Avarranty of quality of a car of grapes sold to plaintiffs by defendant, acting by a produce broker. Plaintiffs did not allege that they gave defendant notice of the alleged breach (see. 4-9 of the Sales Act, 1915, P. L. ’557). Defendant denied the warranty. After the evidence was in, the eonrt directed a verdict for plaintiffs, giving the following reason therefor: “Having cancelled his contract, the defendant could not of his own volition reinstate it. He says he had given the order diverting the car to Pittsburgh the day he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hamberger v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Descalzi v. North American Fruit ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Montgomery v. MichelsonPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1927
  3. Keystone Furniture Co. v. Danneman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API