Legal Opinion

State v. Steele

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 7526SC334PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant, defendant’s attorney, and the assistant district attorney entered into a written stipulation which provided that the results of a polygraph test would be admissible in evidence. Despite the stipulation, defendant assigns error to the admission of the test results.

In 1923, the first appellate court to consider the admissibility of polygraph evidence set out the standard for acceptance which has been followed ever since. Appellant in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) had been convicted of murder and appealed the trial court’s refusal to admit the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. State v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. State v. TrimbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API