State v. Steele
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant, defendant’s attorney, and the assistant district attorney entered into a written stipulation which provided that the results of a polygraph test would be admissible in evidence. Despite the stipulation, defendant assigns error to the admission of the test results.
In 1923, the first appellate court to consider the admissibility of polygraph evidence set out the standard for acceptance which has been followed ever since. Appellant in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) had been convicted of murder and appealed the trial court’s refusal to admit the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- State v. TrimbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State v. SouelOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.