Legal Opinion

State v. Souel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1978No. 77-486PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

The appellate court below certified the following question for final determination by this court:

“Whether the results of a polygraph examination are admissible into evidence when the defendant, prior to the examination, consents by written stipulation to the admissibility thereof, but withdraws his consent after the results of the test are known but prior to introduction of the testimony at trial.”

For the reasons hereinafter set forth we resolve this question in the affirmative.

The decisions of other jurisdictions relative to this precise issue have not been consistent or uniform. Basically,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API