Legal Opinion
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 22, 2005No. Court 02-00756; Slip Op. 05-37PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
AQUILINO, Senior Judge.
The above-encaptioned plaintiff producer of steel in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (“RTT”), which apparently has recently changed its corporate name to Mit-tal Steel Point Lisas Limited, pleads for relief from that part of the final determination of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) sub nom. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 Fed.Reg. 66,662 (Nov. 1, 2002), which concluded that the domestic U.S. industry is materially injured by reason…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Caribbean Ispat Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.