Legal Opinion

DiLeo v. Daneault

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The named plaintiffs as representatives respectively of Local 186 of the Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers and Cosmetologists’ International Union of America, hereinafter called the local, and of the corresponding international organization, hereinafter called the international, bring this suit to compel the redelivery (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 214, § 3 [1], as appearing in St. 1950, c. 387) to the plaintiffs or their authorized representative of two so called union shop cards which had been supplied by the plaintiffs to the defendant as the proprietor of two barber shops in Worcester for display…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tocci v. LemboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. R. H. White Co. v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Nashua & Lowell Railroad v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Saveall v. DemersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Fouquette v. MilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A.Z. v. B.Z.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Journeymen Barbers' International Union, Local 687 v. PollinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Jones v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Seekonk Family Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. MadinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API