Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists, & Proprietors International Union of America, Local Union No. 205 v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
Plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court and we will herein refer to it as the Union. Defendant in error was plaintiff below and we will hereinafter designate it as the Commission.
The action was brought here by writ of error to review the judgment of the district court of the City and County of Denver. That judgment validated the findings of fact and order of the Commission in a proceeding arising under the Labor Peace Act (S.L. ’43, chapter 131), and gave to such findings and order of the Commission the effect of a decree of the district court. The procedure before the Commission…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Riviello v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International Union of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People ex rel. Rhodes v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists International Union, Local 379bWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Rainwater v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCarty v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
- Mosko v. DunbarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Kerkemeyer v. MidkiffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Kerkemeyer v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.