Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Greater M. & S. Circuit, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The plaintiffs, as minority stockholders of the Greater M. & S. Circuit, Inc., a Delaware holding company, sue primarily to void as ultra vires contracts between the parent’s direct and indirect New York subsidiaries and defendant Sherman. Though the attack aims at several agreements, since what affects one applies to all, the agreements will be treated as one.

The holding company represents the 1928 merger of two competing chains of motion picture theatres. It owns no substantial assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. The assets of the subsidiaries consist, directly and indirectly,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Vought v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Linkhauf v. . LombardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Loma Holding Corp. v. Cripple Bush Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Brown v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Elman v. BelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API