Legal Opinion

Elman v. Belson

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968Published

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meter, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person; plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment. The motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to defendant’s pleading in his answer a defense of lack of jurisdiction; the cross motion is dismissed as premature, no answer having yet been served (CPLR 3212, subd. [a]; Pisano v. County of Nassau, 41 Misc 2d 844, affd. 21 A D 2d 754).

Defendant is a resident of Illinois and the holder of a judgment recovered in Illinois against certain New York individuals and corporations. Defendant’s Chicago attorneys came to New York,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Friedr. Zoellner (New York) Corp. v. Tex Metals Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Hertz, Newmark & Warner v. FischmanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  3. Winick v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Strasser v. SchlesingerNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pisano v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API