Legal Opinion
United States v. State of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 26, 2021No. 2:70-cv-09213Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., CASE NO. C70-9213 RSM 9 Plaintiffs, SUBPROCEEDING NO. 20-01 RSM 10 v. ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS 11 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This subproceeding is before the Court on several motions. The requesting party, Upper 16 Skagit Indian Tribe (“Upper Skagit”), initiated this subproceeding to determine whether certain 17 fishing in the Skagit River by the responding party, the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe (“Sauk- 18 Suiattle”), complies with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Giles v. Transit Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.