Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 7, 1996No. 94-683PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Morrill, J.), the defendant, Brian Scott Smith, was convicted of two counts of passing bad checks in November 1993. See RSA 638:4 (1986 & Supp. 1993) (amended 1993). He appeals, arguing that the superior court erred in: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence the police seized while searching his home; and (2) admitting evidence in the State’s case in chief of nineteen prior bad check convictions under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b). We affirm.
*273 I. Motion to Suppress
The defendant first argues that the superior court should have granted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. GracaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. DewittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. PseudaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. DupontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.