In Re Lackawanna Medical Group, P.C.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION 1
JOHN J. THOMAS, Chief Judge.
“[D]oes a bankruptcy court have the power and obligation to review fee applications which have not been the subject of an objection by a party in interest or the United States Trustee? We conclude that it does.” In re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 837 (3rd Cir.1994).
With this clear mandate from the Third Circuit, and the subsequent guidance provided by the court in the In re Busy Beaver case, this Court, sua sponte, reviewed the final fee application of Doran & Nowalis in the above-captioned case and by Order dated August 8, 2003, noted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Larry T. & Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A a & W Drive-In Restaurant & Martin's Exxon, Debtors. Appeal of Larry T. & Cynthia J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- In Re William L. Prince, Debtor. Electro-Wire Products, Inc. v. Sirote & Permutt, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re D & H Machine Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016
- In re: Whiteeagle Properties 22 Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Rus, Miliband & Smith v. Yoo (In Re Dick Cepek, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rus, Miliband & Smith v. Yoo (In Re Dick Cepek, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006