Legal Opinion

Rus, Miliband & Smith v. Yoo (In Re Dick Cepek, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. BAP No. CC-05-1139-MoPaMa. Bankruptcy No. LA 99-19373-ECPublished

1Opinion of the Court

339 B.R. 730 (2006)

In re DICK CEPEK, INC., Debtor.

Rus, Miliband & Smith, APC, Appellant,

v.

Timothy J. Yoo, Chapter 7 Trustee; Andela Consulting, Appellees.

BAP No. CC-05-1139-MoPaMa. Bankruptcy No. LA 99-19373-EC.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted on November 18, 2005.

Filed — March 21, 2006.

D. Edward Hays, Irvine, California, for appellant.

Timothy J. Yoo, Los Angeles, California for appellee.

Before: MONTALI, PAPPAS and MARLAR, Bankruptcy Judges.

Argued and Submitted on November 18, 2005 at Los Angeles, California.

OPINION

MONTALI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Fol…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. In Re Larry T. & Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A a & W Drive-In Restaurant & Martin's Exxon, Debtors. Appeal of Larry T. & Cynthia J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Park-Helena Corp., Debtor. Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API