Legal Opinion

Ervin v. American Guardian Life Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1988No. 2666PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and entering judgment for the defendant physician, the sole issue is whether the physician who, at the request of the insurance company which employed him, examined the electrocardiogram (EKG) of an applicant for insurance, owed a duty to the applicant to discover and disclose heart abnormalities recorded by the electrocardiogram. For reasons hereinafter stated, we agree with the trial court that in the absence of a physician-patient relationship or other basis for imposing upon the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lotspeich v. Chance Vought AircraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Kyle v. McNamara & CristeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harris v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Dyer v. TrachtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sidney C. Green, Etc., Joni Green, Individually and on Behalf of the Minor Child, Jennifer Green v. Leslie Walker, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API