Legal Opinion
Gee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 7, 1994No. C-94-0659-VRWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff challenges the Immigration and Nationalization Service’s (“INS”) revocation of immigrant visa petitions that she filed on behalf of her natural siblings. Plaintiff Mary Pui Ching Gee emigrated from Hong Kong in 1968 under an immigration provision that permitted orphans to enter the United States for adoption by U.S. citizens. Plaintiff became a naturalized American citizen in 1974.
When plaintiff immigrated to the United States in 1968, she left behind five biological siblings. Three of these siblings now reside in the United States; two are American…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Richard Rylewicz, Thomas Cummings and Barbara Cummings v. Beaton Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philip Yuk Yu MA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Karen Yuen Fong YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, DefendantAppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Young v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- MABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998