Legal Opinion
Young v. Reno
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 16, 1996No. Civil 95-00871 DAEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE; DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.
The court heard the parties’ motions on July 15, 1996. Donald Ungar, Esq., and William F. Thompson, III, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Plaintiff Karen Yuen Fong Young (“Plaintiff”); Mary Reiko Osaka, Special Assistant United States Attorney, appeared at the hearing on behalf of Defendant Janet Reno (“the Government”). After reviewing the motion and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karen Yuen Fong YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, DefendantAppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Systronics Corp. v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Ramilo v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1998