Legal Opinion
Bayer v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1994No. 93-CF-501, 93-CF-532PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Bayer and Bianchi, appeal from their convictions for simple assault. D.C.Code § 22-504 (1989 Repl.). They contend (1) that the trial court’s aiding and abetting instruction to the jury had no evi-dentiary basis and (2), that the trial court violated the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1988), by refusing to order production of a police officer’s notes of a witness interview. See Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1957). We find no error in the aiding and abetting instruction, but, because the trial court erred in refusing to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Clancy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- John L. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flores v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lazo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.