Legal Opinion
Flores v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1997No. 95-CM-594PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Antonio Miguel Flores, was found guilty of simple assault against Lucia Lainez and was sentenced to 180 days, execution of sentence suspended, and a one-year term of probation. As one of the conditions of probation, the trial court ordered Flores to temporarily pay child support for his daughter with Lainez, which the court later entered as a permanent order of child support. Flores presents four issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights when it curtailed the cross-examination of Lainez, the government’s key witness; 2)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kaliku v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Crutchfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.