Legal Opinion

Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 6, 2016No. UM1402; A150814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

In another installment of a long-running dispute related to the closure of the Trojan nuclear power plant, petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that granted respondent Portland General Electric’s (PGE) request to amortize in its rates certain costs of issuing a refund to ratepayers.

Petitioner challenges the PUC’s order on several grounds, asserting that the order is unlawful because (1) charging ratepayers for administering the refund violates ORS 757.355, (2) the PUC prevented petitioner from challenging the refund mechanism used by PGE, (3) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Dreyer v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API