Legal Opinion

Haddock v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1996No. 95-128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Gary Haddock, Jr. appeals from the judgment and sentence which was entered after he pleaded guilty to one count of credit card fraud and one count of forgery.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Appellant presents a single issue on appeal:

Did the trial court abuse its discretion in not allowing withdrawal of Appellant’s guilty plea prior to sentencing?

FACTS

On September 23, 1994, Appellant was charged with credit card fraud for unlawfully using a credit card which belonged to his mother and father. He was also charged with forgery for unlawfully endorsing and cashing a check which belonged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Triplett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. McCarty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Barnes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gilber Aldolfo Delgado, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Grady v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Anthony Rodriguez v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API