Haugen v. Blaine Bank of Montana
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
Plaintiffs Russell and Donn R. Haugen appeal an order of the District Court for the Seventeenth Judicial District, Blaine County, dismissing their claim for failing to meet the requirements of Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P. We affirm.
We address the following issues on appeal:
*41. Did the District Court err in determining that Plaintiffs failed to meet the requirements of Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P., thereby requiring dismissal of their claim?
2. Did Plaintiffs file their Notice of Appeal in a timely manner?
Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiffs filed their complaint on August 28, 1992, seeking damages…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Nelson v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Yarborough v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Schmitz v. VasquezMontana Supreme Court · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.