Legal Opinion

Haugen v. Blaine Bank of Montana

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1996No. 95-554PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Plaintiffs Russell and Donn R. Haugen appeal an order of the District Court for the Seventeenth Judicial District, Blaine County, dismissing their claim for failing to meet the requirements of Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P. We affirm.

We address the following issues on appeal:

*41. Did the District Court err in determining that Plaintiffs failed to meet the requirements of Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P., thereby requiring dismissal of their claim?

2. Did Plaintiffs file their Notice of Appeal in a timely manner?

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on August 28, 1992, seeking damages…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Yarborough v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schmitz v. VasquezMontana Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API