Legal Opinion

Morrow v. FBS Ins. Montana-Hoiness Labar

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1988No. 87-370PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

The Thirteenth Judicial District Court granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The issue here is whether the lower court, in granting summary judgment, erred in finding that there were no material questions of fact. We reverse on this issue and remand the cause for trial.

Appellant Morrow, a subcontractor, alleged that respondent FBS Insurance Montana-Hoiness LaBar, Inc., (FBS), a construction bonding agent, intentionally interfered with Morrow’s prospective economic advantage. The economic advantage allegedly jeopardized by FBS’s conduct was the award of a subcontract offered by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cereck v. Albertson's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bolz v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fleming v. Fleming Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Home and Investment Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. LaTray v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Miller v. HerbertMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mickelson v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API